On Tuesday last week the Administration’s tariff regime was dealt a rare rebuke from both sides of the aisle when a group of House Republicans joined Democrats in defeating a rule that would have blocked any snap votes to repeal the tariffs until July. The pushback continued the next day when the House passed by a vote of 219-211 a resolution disapproving of the Trump Administration’s tariffs against Canada. More Democratic-led tariff disapproval resolutions are anticipated.
While this is a positive development for tariff opponents, it should be kept in perspective. Excluding a few Republican members in swing districts, the majority supporting these measures are dedicated Trump antagonists, and several have announced their retirement. Senate passage of the resolutions is possible but by no means guaranteed, and there is no indication that veto-proof majorities exist. Although all 217 Democrats voted against the rule and the Canadian tariff disapproval resolution, the Trade Review Act of 2025 (H.R. 2665) that would restore Congressional authority over all tariffs has only eight co-sponsors (including only 2 of the GOP members who supported the resolution) and has not added any since April of last year. These votes therefore could be viewed as “performative legilectioneering” that is unlikely to lead to tariff elimination in the short term.
Moreover, last week President Trump repeated his predilection for using tariffs to leverage foreign policy, admitting that he had increased tariffs on Switzerland because he did not like the way that nation’s former leader spoke on a call. Taking further aim against Canada, he also suggested that he might not allow a new bridge connecting Michigan to Canada and funded by the Canadian government to open. This latest jab continues the ongoing dispute between the President and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and likely could be posturing ahead of upcoming negotiations over renewing the USMCA trade agreement between the U.S., Canada and Mexico. If history is any guide regarding such talks, additional aggressive actions may be anticipated.
Disclaimer: APPA does not make any representations about the completeness, suitability, or adequacy of the information provided during the Office Hours or Trade Talks. Any information provided are intended for general informational purposes only, they do not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to do or omit to do any action and should not be interpreted as legal, regulatory, or compliance advice. You should seek independent advice from qualified professionals before acting on any information provided and/or to evaluate specific regulatory obligations and operational decisions.
Disclaimer from Progressive Trade Consulting: PTC is not a law firm, does not practice law, and does not provide legal advice. The Client should consult legal counsel for any legal matters, including trade compliance. The Importer of Record (IOR) is responsible for complying with customs regulations and managing the import process. This includes obtaining required licenses and permits, classifying and valuing goods correctly, declaring goods accurately, paying duties and taxes, following import rules, and maintaining proper records.